The Snake Keeper Blog

An agreement between a landowner and a real estate developer for the construction of new projects is called a joint development agreement. In a common development, the capital, the client carries out construction and justice work, while the landowner makes the land available. There are two common types of JDAs. They are as follows: the development of land in parcels and, subsequently, the sale of such land should not be taxable if the land does not in itself fall within GST Zone A (neither supply of goods nor services according to SCH-III), so how can there be a question of taxation of land? When the land is sold, they own all the properties of the land. The simple development from one land to another will not change the nature of the country. The same will always remain a motionless property and will only be called land in general. It would therefore be outside the scope of the GST. The only taxable turnover in such cases is the value of the works/contracts of enterprise. The sale of land should therefore not be taxable. A developer purchased the following goods and services [other than capital goods and services through the granting of development rights, long-term land leases or ISPs] for the construction of a residential real estate project during a fiscal year. For commercial housing (shops, offices, godowns, etc.) in RREP (Residential Real Estate Project), the GST CGST rate is 2.5% plus SGST/UTGST 2.5% (total of 5%) (excluding ITC). The actual GST rate for housing under construction, real estate or commercial real estate is 18%. However, 1/3 out of 18% is considered the value of the land or the total share of the land made available to the buyer of the property.

Thus, the rate will be 12% with the full ITC. However, the Hon`ble ITAT Hyderabad Bench `B` is in the case of Adhinarayana Reddy Kummeta v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle -11(1), Hyderabad 2018 (4) IMT 37 – ITAT HYDERABAD found that Section 45(5A) cannot be applied as a substantive provision to the previously concluded development agreement, which would certainly be drawn into Section 2(47)(v). Under the new regime, the GST rates for residential dwellings are as follows: in a similar judgment in Nforce Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd [20 G.S.T.L. 184], the Authority found that the taxable person provided construction services to the development rights provider in exchange for consideration in the form of a transfer of development rights. . .

.

All the terms of the agreement must be read and understood so that there is no error as to the nature of the agreement. ERROR REGARDING THE NATURE OF THE AGREEMENT – The terms of a contract must be read and understood to ensure that there is no error as to the nature of the agreement. The events in Example 8 would be considered fraudulent because Mr Johnson deliberately carried out an act to ensure that the car was not working properly. I. Error: The misrepresentation of a fact in a treaty, which is most likely innocent, however has different options for eliminating the agreement. EXAMPLE 2 (PG. 107) – In the opening example, Jake did not read the contract between him and Mr. Johnson on the Mustang, and if he had read carefully, he would have seen that the car was a 1965 model and not a 1964 model. EXCEPTION – FACE TO FACE – If the agreement of a contract is concluded in person, the contract may be cancelled if one of the parties to the treaty uses threats to try to get the other party to accept and comply with the terms of the agreement. A contract concluded under duress cannot be contested, because if the threats were part of the event, the contract will be automatically canceled.

The statements in Example 7 are not considered an essential fact in proving fraud, since the general popularity of others plays no role in the judgment. . d. In fact, rely on your words to make the sale. EXAMPLE 6 (p. 108) – When Jake asked Mr. Johnson if the Mustang was a 64 or 65 or not, and Johnson, who knew it was a `65, said it was a 64, Jake could claim damages. III.

An innocent misrepresentation – a false statement by a party that should have precise knowledge (such as an antique dealer) – the COUNTERVAILABLE ECONOMIC INCENTIVE – influence a commercial interest through the use of threats. (INVALID) EXAMPLE 13 (p. 112) – Paulding, an old woman, lived with her son, who convinced her to sell him $150,000 for $50,000. But in the end, the mother refused to review the sale of the country to her son because Paulding discovered that her son would sell the property to Visconti for $175,000 for the construction of an apartment building. UNILATERAL ERROR – An error made by a party to a contract (NOT CONTESTABLE). D.) Representation you can rely on – you rely on a truthful person when you buy something from someone else.. . . .

At the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) meeting, Prime Minister Modi championed Aatmanirbhar Bharat`s cause of making India a force multiplier for the global economy. The government has identified 27 champion sectors that can compete globally through the initial workforce. However, in sectors/industries where national capacities are insufficient, dependence on quality and competitive imports is inevitable. This is where the role of free trade agreements begins. A comprehensive analysis of trade between India and its main FTA partners, mentioned above, shows a significant increase in trade since the agreements went into operation. SAFTA came into effect on 01 Bilateral trade between India and other SAFTA member countries increased from $6.8 billion in 2005-2006 to $28.5 billion in 2018-19, according to data from the Ministry of Trade and Industry. SAFTA`s Indian trade has grown faster than overall trade with the world. As a result, the share of SAFTA countries in India`s international trade increased from 1.6% in 2005-2006 to 2.5% in 2018-19. At the same time, India`s exports to SAFTA countries grew faster than their imports from them, resulting in a sharp increase in the trade surplus with these economies from about $4 billion to $21 billion. The maximum growth in exports to the SAFTA region was recorded with Bangladesh and Nepal.

It is remarkable that India has forged major free trade alliances with Asian countries (ASEAN, Japan and Korea) around the GJ10. Despite this, the share of these markets in Indian exports has declined over the past decade, from 51% to 46%. Over the same period, the share of traditional markets like the United States and Europe in our exports increased from 38% to 43%, although none of the countries in the region have concluded a free trade agreement. . . .